| Chairman's Blog: A Memo to Tiger Woods |
Print Story
|
|
Nov 30 2009 |
By Stacey Woelfel, RTDNA Chairman |
|
| Chairman's Blog: A Memo to Tiger Woods |
Print Story
|
|
Nov 30 2009 |
By Stacey Woelfel, RTDNA Chairman |
|
|
| Comments |
|
Eye Of The Tiger
Tiger Woods is blinded by his own fame. He doesn't see the world the way a journalist does. Instead, he feels that he's a normal guy until it's time to sign his paycheck. So, please believe that he's enjoying this surge in popularity that he's having. I almost feel as if his publicist is suggesting that he stays elusive to heighten public interest in this story. As a "civilian", I just want to move on, but as a journalist, I do want to know more. It is our job to be storytellers, so why not wait until the REAL STORY is told. Great job!
By Zack Isaacs on Dec 01 2009
|
|
Public Service?
I always understood journalism to be a public service -- keeping the public informed so they can make the best decision on an issue they are voting on or something that will affect their lives or community. Exactly what service is being performed by demanding a full explanation from Tiger Woods about an incident that only affected him? None. It's spurious demands like this from 'journalists' looking only to satisfy their own curiosity brings the entire profession down.
By Danielle on Dec 01 2009
|
|
If I were Tiger ....
I'd respond by simply saying, "Fine, you don't like it, stop covering me and making me wealthy." Truth is, Tiger gets rich off the media exposure, but media make a ton of money off Tiger too. He sells papers, gets ratings, draws advertisers, etc. While I love a good holier-than-thou argument as much as the next guy, ignoring the fact that the media has a commercial interest in covering everything Tiger does (good or bad) makes this just a laughable smokescreen justification for covering this barely-a-story to death.
By Jeremy Littau on Dec 01 2009
|
|
Tiger Woods
On the wall in my family room I have posted the top 100,000 world issues in order of importance. Among the top 10 are Afghanistan, nukes in Iran, etc. I was going to post Tiger Woods. He would have been issue No. 100,001. Fortunately I ran out of wall space.
By Harry Kovsky on Dec 04 2009
|
|
RTDNA Chairman's Tiger attack
The Chairman of RTNDA is sounding like a Managing Editor of a tabloid... not a responsible journalist. The chair might want to revisit journalism's roots and the reasons why news is supposed to 'serve the public' true interests. You know... news that can actually help the public to live a better life for themselves and their families. Might the chair leave tabloid fodder for the checkout line at the supermarkets?
By Chip on Dec 04 2009
|
|
Tiger Woods
Memo to: Danielle, Jeremy, Harry and Chip: I must say I am surprised at your apparent lack of understanding of the public interest element of this story. As journalists - which I'm assuming you are - I would expect you to have noted the extraordinary amount of global coverage this "fallen idol" story has generated. The reasons the public needs to hear about Tiger's transgressions are many and varied. Some will see it as proof that even a sports super hero has the same human frailties as the rest of us; others will be seeking the truth about the man they trusted enough to purchase the products he endorsed. Here in Victoria, Australia, our regional government paid Mr Woods three-million taxpayer dollars to come out and play golf. He didn't even have to win! Of course, win he did - and took home the $250,000 prize money in addition to the public donation. That $3,000,000 could have been used to help fix our failing public hospitals, our dodgy transport system or provide shelter for our growing legion of homeless kids. Instead, we are hearing that it may have been used to fly out a mistress and put her up in a $35,000-a-night hotel room across the corridor from Mr Woods. So you see Danielle, Jeremy, Harry and Chip, the public interest in this story is as real as it is justifiable. As journalists it is as much our job to understand the public interest as it is to uncover the truth.
By Rob McLennan on Dec 05 2009
|
|
in retrosepct
It is nearly thirty days since this missive was written. I have just read it. Since it was written, the greatest breach of homeland security has happened and Al Quaida nearly took out another plane. If you all in the media would look at issues like airline security, wall street corruption, instead of whom Tiger has been banging for how long, we would all be better off. I had to read the China Daily to learn China's stance toward revaluation of the yuan- we should have been reading that in all out local papers since china owns them now.
By Don From Galveston on Dec 29 2009
|
|
Is it OK for journalists to publicly share (on Facebook or Twitter, for example) their views on Obama's support for gay marriage? |
|
| POST YOUR THOUGHTS | |
| recent posts | most viewed | recent tags |
Why the Inverted Pyramid Should Rarely Be First Choice in TV News RTDNA Participates As Amicus Curiae In Appeal of FOIA Decision by U.S. Secret Service An Old Friend has a New Name |
||
|